Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Collins
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 20, 1986No. 85-1427PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
This case requires us, for the first time, to interpret certain provisions of the District of Columbia Compulsory/No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act of 1982 (“the No-Fault Act”), D.C. Code §§ 35-2101 through 35-2113 (1985. Supp.). Appellant Johnson, a taxicab driver, brought this action against appellee Collins to recover damages for injuries he allegedly received in a collision with a car driven by Collins. The trial court, concluding that the limits imposed by the No-Fault Act on the filing of civil liability actions barred any recovery by Johnson, granted Collins’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Office of People's Counsel v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Nova University v. Educational Institution Licensure CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Dyer v. D.C. Department of Housing & Community DevelopmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Monroe v. ForemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ward v. Nationwide Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Coleman v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Stackhouse v. SchneiderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Makanju v. SaundersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.