Legal Opinion

Underhill v. Safeco Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1979No. Docket Nos. 58567, 60967. (Calendar Nos. 8, 9)PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The issues presented concern the status of motorcyclists under the no-fault motor vehicle liability act:

1) Are motorcyclists, who are not required to purchase no-fault insurance, entitled to "personal protection insurance benefits” (for work loss, allowable expenses and survivors’ loss), commonly referred to as PIP or first-party benefits and hereafter referred to as "no-fault benefits”?

2) Does a legislative scheme exempting motorcyclists from the burden imposed on other motor vehicle owners of maintaining financial security for the payment of no-fault benefits but including them among the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Department of Natural Resources v. SeamanMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. FieldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Westervelt v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. StarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Belcher v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Corwin v. DaimlerChrysler InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Nelson v. Transamerica Insurance ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Dobbelaere v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API