Legal Opinion
Cna v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 22, 2008No. 06-5104PublishedCited by 527 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
CNA and Continental Casualty Company, 1 stepping into the place of Michael Lahoff as his subrogees, sued the Government under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80. They base their claims on negligence that they allege led to Lahoff being severely injured. CNA and Continental (hereinafter “Subrogees”) appeal the District Court’s order granting the Government’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). They raise two arguments on appeal: that the District…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by527 opinions
- Kerns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Lincoln Benefit Life Co. v. AEI Life, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Davis v. Wells Fargo, U.S.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Constitution Party of Pennsylv v. Carol AicheleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Group Against Smog & Pollution, Inc. v. Shenango Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
522 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.