Legal Opinion

Broxie v. Household Finance Company

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1977No. 3PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

POMEROY, Justice.

We deal in this appeal with whether a party who has moved for judgment non obstante veredicto waives its right to appellate review of a denial of that motion when the party fails to request the trial court to charge in accordance with the legal standard which the moving party later seeks to have applied in judging the sufficiency of the evidence.

In 1971, appellee, Richard Broxie, sued appellant, Household Finance Company [“Household”], in trespass for damages arising from Broxie’s dismissal as an employee of the United States Post Office. The dismissal had…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. SisakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Stewart v. ChernickySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Bell v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Quinby v. Plumsteadville Family Practice, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. PressleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Tagnani v. LewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Rohm & Haas Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API