Legal Opinion

Wick v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 15, 1952No. 35,740PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Christianson, Justice.

Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for architectural services rendered to defendants by plaintiffs pursuant to contract. The trial court made findings and conclusions and ordered judgment for defendants. Plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

Plaintiffs, W. T. Wick and L. H. Stansfield, both registered architects, are copartners doing business under the firm name of Wick & Stansfield at Mankato, Minnesota. Defendants, Cyril C. Murphy and Mary Helen Murphy, consulted plaintiffs in April 1949 with respect to remodeling their dwelling in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wm. Lindeke Land Co. v. KalmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. Liljengren Furniture & Lumber Co. v. MeadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Lucas v. Ganley Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Loyal Order of Moose, Adrian Lodge 1034 v. FaulhaberMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. O'Connell v. WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Donnay v. BoulwareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. Tempworks Mgmt. Servs., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  3. Combined Insurance Co. of America v. BodeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. ICC Leasing Corp. v. Midwestern MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Naftalin v. John Wood CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API