John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. Laos
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 Beth and Enrico Laos (“the Laoses”) appeal from the trial court’s denial of their Rule 60(c)(5), Ariz. R. Civ. P., motion for relief from judgment entered in favor of John Munic Enterprises, Inc. (“Munic”), and its denial of their request for a fair market valuation hearing pursuant to AR.S. § 12-1566. On appeal, they argue that the court was biased against them, that it erred in applying the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act (“UCATA”) to prevent a settlement amount between Munic and its attorney from serving as a credit against the judgment entered…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Patent Scaffolding Co. v. William Simpson Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jacobs Eng'g Grp. Inc. v. Conagra Foods, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Jacobs Engr. Group v. ConAgra FoodsNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Concetta Rizzio v. Surpass Senior Living LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- Ramsey v. Arizona Registrar of ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- State ex rel. Brnovich v. Maricopa County Community College District BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.