Legal Opinion
Zimco Restaurants, Inc. v. Bartenders Union, Local 340
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 18, 1958No. Civ. 17818PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ST. CLAIR, J. pro tem. *
A group consisting of two individuals and three corporations, the owners and operators of six drive-in restaurants in San Mateo County entered into an agreement on June 26, 1952, with Local 340 of the Bartenders and Culinary Workers Union. In the preamble, the five owners were referred to simply by “hereinafter called the ‘Employer.’ ” Each of the owners signed the agreement; there was no reference to them in any collective capacity on the signature page or anywhere in the agreement, other than as above.
The pertinent portion of that agreement (Exhibit A) reads: “1. An…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Long Beach Drug Co. v. United Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Shafer v. Registered Pharmacists Union Local 1172California Supreme Court · 1940
- Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Green v. ObergfellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kip Rano v. Sipa Press, Inc., Sipa, Inc., Goskin Sipahioglu, SipaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Consolidated Theatres, Inc. v. Theatrical Stage Employees Union, Local 16California Supreme Court · 1968
- Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Co. v. John J. Reynolds, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Cooper Companies, Inc. v. Transcontinental InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.