Legal Opinion
E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Claiborne-Reno Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 20, 1933No. 9610PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The parties will be referred to in this opinion as tlie Du Pont Company and the Reno Company.
The Dn Pont Company brought suit against the Reno Company for $5,989.88, part of which was for goods sold and deliv-arad, and part for a balance due upon a promissory note. The Tieno Company ad-milted this indebtedness, but set up a counterclaim for $350,000 damages for breach of contract. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the Reno Company for $41,588.12. From the judgment entered upon the verdict, the Du Pont Com-piUiy has appealed.
The Reno…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Weil v. NearySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Cold Blast Transp. Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Clausen & Sons, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Meissner v. Simpson Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
- Hoge v. Farmers Market & Supply Co. of Las Cruces, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
- Jack's Cookie Company, and Cross-Appellee v. A. A. Brooks, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- Lewis v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.