Legal Opinion

People v. Heuss

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1928No. Docket No. 1708PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of the crime of forgery, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

The defendant was convicted upon both direct and circumstantial evidence. There was undoubtedly sufficient evidence to justify the verdict of the jury.

Counsel for appellant insists that appellant was entitled to an instruction to the effect that, in order to convict upon circumstantial evidence, it is necessary not only that all the circumstances concur to show that the defendant committed the crime charged, but it must also be shown that all of these circumstances are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. People v. StrassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People v. RaentschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. HatchettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. People v. SimeoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. RayolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. People v. McClainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. People v. McCreeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API