People v. Rayol
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
FOX, J. pro tem.—
Defendant was charged by an information with a violation of section 288a of the Penal Code. A jury trial resulted in a verdict of guilty. She appeals from the order denying her motion for a new trial.
At about six o’clock in the evening of October 19, 1943, defendant went to a certain cafe and cocktail bar in the city of Los Angeles. When she went there she had twenty-five dollars. During the evening she spent it all but one dollar, buying drinks for herself and the service men who came up to the bar. She left there in a taxi at twelve o’clock with an Army officer whose face…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hatfield v. Levy BrothersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. HatchettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- People v. McClainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Morton v. Manhattan Lunch Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- People v. KinowakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.