Calhoun v. Greening
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
Dale Calhoun appeals from the superior court’s refusal to vacate a judgment against him pursuant to Alaska Civil Rule 60(b).1 *71We hold that Calhoun’s motion to vacate is barred by the doctrine of res judicata, and hence affirm the superior court’s judgment denying the Civil Rule 60(b) motion.
It is not necessary for us to set out all the details of this proeedurally convoluted case, so we will only state the points relevant to our decision. In July 1976, John Greening filed a complaint against a corporation and seven individuals, including Calhoun. The complaint…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Salvatore Cirami, Salvatore Cirami & Margaret CiramiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Winfield Associates, Inc. v. W. L. StonecipherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Drickersen v. DrickersenAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Perkins v. SalemDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Dellwo v. PetersenIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- DeNardo v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Jackinsky v. JackinskyAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Tolstrup v. MillerAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- McGee v. McGeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Wengerd v. RinehartCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.