Legal Opinion
DeNardo v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1987No. S-1260PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
Daniel DeNardo appeals from the superi- or court’s dismissal of his complaint with prejudice. The superior court grounded its dismissal on the doctrine of res judicata. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND.
The State of Alaska terminated Daniel DeNardo’s employment in 1978 at the request of the Alaska Public Employees Association (APEA). The collective bargaining agreement between APEA and the state then in effect for general government employees required the state to terminate any such employee who failed to comply with the agency shop provisions of the agreement upon…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Arnold Maxwell Harris v. George JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Moffat v. MoffatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Bresolin v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Calhoun v. GreeningAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Drickersen v. DrickersenAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Timothy William HISER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard H. FRANKLIN; Frank Sauser; Al Terrault, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Sengupta v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Martech Construction Co. v. Ogden Environmental Services, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Hoffman Construction Company of Oregon, an Oregon Corporation v. Active Erectors and Installers, Inc., a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.