Legal Opinion

Jackinsky v. Jackinsky

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1995No. S-6081PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER *

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The question of whether or not the preliminary injunction, which was reinstated by order of Justice Compton on April 13, 1995, should be continued is REMANDED to the Superior Court. The preliminary injunction shall remain in effect pending the Superior Court’s determination whether or not to continue the preliminary injunction.

2. The Superior Court may proceed with the hearing concerning the preliminary injunction before the expiration of the ten-day period for filing a petition for rehearing or before this court rules on any petition for rehearing which may be filed.

En…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Jefferson v. AsplundAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Johnson v. Alaska State Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Tolstrup v. MillerAlaska Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Andrew Robinson International, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. Sengupta v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. McGee v. McGeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Rooney v. RooneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Ross v. AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API