Legal Opinion

Tolstrup v. Miller

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1986No. S-1080PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

This case presents the question of whether a stipulation to dismiss with prejudice certain misrepresentation claims precludes a foreclosure on real property when the underlying claims arose from the same transaction. Superior Court Judge Joan M. Katz concluded that the doctrine of res judicata barred the instant nonjudicial foreclosure, and granted plaintiffs summary judgment motion. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 1978, Vance Tolstrup and Michael Huffman were involved in a small computer business called Data-Com Systems, Inc. In June 1978, Huffman…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. GreeningAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Fairbanks Builders, Inc. v. Sandstrom Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Saxton v. SplettstoezerAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Bank of America v. Department of Mental HygieneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Pankratz v. State, Department of HighwaysAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Timothy William HISER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard H. FRANKLIN; Frank Sauser; Al Terrault, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Jackinsky v. JackinskyAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Plumber v. University of Alaska AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API