Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Kulczyk
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 6, 2003No. 21042-1-IIIPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
63 P.3d 156 (2003)
115 Wash.App. 411
Alan BOYD and Cindy Boyd, husband and wife d/b/a Boyd Utility Contracting, Respondents,
v.
Louis KULCZYK and Jane Doe Kulczyk, husband and wife d/b/a Lakeshore Tie and Lumber Company, Appellants.
No. 21042-1-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Four.
February 6, 2003.
Stanley A. Kempner, Spokane, for Appellants.
Joseph A. Esposito, Spokane, for Respondents.
SCHULTHEIS, J.
Alan Boyd and his wife sued Louis Kulczyk and his wife for damages due to Mr. Kulczyk's alleged breach of a leasing agreement.[1] Because he was unable to serve process on Mr.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Moreman v. ButcherWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Guijosa v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Guijosa v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stevens v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Stevens v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Hough v. StockbridgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Hough v. StockbridgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Stanley v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.