State v. Ferguson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDimmick, J.
Petitioner Frank Ferguson was convicted of indecent liberties. In this appeal he challenges several evi-dentiary rulings made by the trial court. The Court of Appeals upheld the conviction. We affirm.
Ferguson was convicted by a jury of knowingly causing his 10-year-old stepdaughter to have sexual contact with him. RCW 9A.44.100(1). The principal witness at trial was petitioner's stepdaughter. She testified that her stepfather *133forced her to have sexual contact with him on many occasions. Her testimony was very detailed as to the nature and extent of the contact. She even testified as to her…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. TharpWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. SaltarelliWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. CunninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. GolladayWashington Supreme Court · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. Kwan Fai MakWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. HalstienWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.