Legal Opinion
Guijosa v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 4, 2001No. 70102-4PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.
— Petitioners sought review of the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming the trial court’s judgment in favor of Wal-Mart as to claims of discrimination, malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, battery, and violations of the Consumer Protection Act, chapter 19.86 RCW. At issue is whether the trial court correctly granted a motion for judgment as a matter of law, setting aside the jury’s verdict, on the claim of Consumer Protection Act violations. The record does not contain substantial evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict that Wal-Mart violated the Consumer Protection Act. Therefore,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Sing v. John L. Scott, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Sing v. John L. Scott, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Wei Zhang v. American Gem Seafoods, Inc., Delaware Corporation McMi Food Company, a Texas Corporation Harry Lees, a Natural PersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Davis v. Microsoft Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- Davis v. Microsoft Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- Holiday Resort Community Ass'n v. Echo Lake Associates, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Faust v. AlbertsonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.