Legal Opinion

Rivadell, Inc. v. Razo

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 1963No. Civ. 26443PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.

Defendant owned two lots, located on Ventura Boulevard, in Sherman Oaks, California. One lot was fully improved with an eight-unit motel. The other lot was largely vacant, although a four-unit apartment was located on the rear portion of the lot. The parties referred in testimony to this second lot as the “vacant” lot and we adopt their terminology.

On February 9, 1960, in response to a newspaper advertisement, defendant’s wife phoned plaintiff and its president and a salesman called on defendant. After a conversation, and under circumstances hereinafter described in detail, defendant signed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Crescent Lumber Co. v. LarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Edwards v. BillowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Palpar, Inc. v. ThayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Pray v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Enoch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  2. Borror v. Department of InvestmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Feder v. River's Edge Restaurant, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Matthews v. StarrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Hewko v. G. I. Trucking Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API