Legal Opinion

Rose v. Sapulpa Rural Water Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 14, 1981No. 53661PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice:

The issue presented here is whether the depositions, admissions, answers to interrogatories, and affidavits on file show that there is no substantial controversy as to any material fact in this case and, if such is the case, whether defendant is thereby entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 1

On appellate review, all inferences and conclusions to be drawn from the underlying facts contained in the record should be viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion for summary judgment. 2

The uncontroverted facts in the record before us, insofar as they are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Doyle v. South Pittsburgh Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Lisle v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Niehaus Bros. Co. v. Contra Costa Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. DingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Lowery v. Echostar Satellite Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Wofford v. Eastern State HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Keel v. Titan Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Pickens v. Tulsa Metropolitan MinistrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API