Legal Opinion

Keel v. Titan Construction Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 1, 1981No. 53980PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L4VENDER, Justice:

For the purpose of testing the sufficiency of a petition to withstand a demurrer, a demurrer admits the truth of all facts well pleaded together with all inferences which may be legally drawn therefrom. 1 On appeal from an order sustaining a de murrer, the petition must be liberally construed and all of its allegations of fact must be taken as true, together with all reasonable inferences therefrom. 2

Insofar as the same is pertinent to the issues hereinafter discussed, the petition alleges: Plaintiffs entered into a contract in writing with Defendant Titan Construction…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. J'Aire Corp. v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Connor v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Colony Insurance Co. v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. Schrock v. Wyeth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. Wathor v. Mutual Assurance Administrators, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  4. Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. Great Plains Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DabneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API