Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. McIntire
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garfield County; M. C. Garber, Judge. Action by Frances E. Mclntire against the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
This proceeding in error is to review the judgment of the lower court in an action wherein the defendant in error, as plaintiff, sued the plaintiff in error, as defendant, for damages alleged to have been sustained on account of the death of her husband, Edwin C. Mclntire, at Wichita, Kansas, on the 5th day of September, 1907.
The following questions are raised: (1) The lower, court was without jurisdiction; (2) a cause of action not stated; and (3) error in giving certain instructions.
1.’ Counsel for plaintiff in error in their brief say:
“The statutes of Oklahoma and Kansas, .providing for…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DuranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Lisle v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Dewey Portland Cement Co. v. BluntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Harrington v. Central States Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- E. S. Billington Lumber Co. v. CheathamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.