Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Perkins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 31, 1979No. 7810SC816PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The plaintiffs in their complaint filed 31 October 1975, alleged three causes of action. The defendants Goldberg in their answer made eight defenses and two cross-claims. Defendants Perkins and Finley, Inc., in their answer made six defenses and a counterclaim. Plaintiffs filed a reply to the counterclaim. All parties agreed on a Proposed Order on Final Pretrial Conference in July 1978, but this Order was not submitted to the trial court because the motions of the defendants to dismiss all causes of action under Rule 12(b)(6) were heard and allowed on 10 July 1978.

First Cause Of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hardy v. TolerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Love v. PressleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Calloway v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Mangum v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Setzer v. OLD REPUBLIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Hudson-Cole Development Corp. v. BeemerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Bhatti v. BucklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Gabriel v. O'HARASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Breeden v. Richmond Community CollegeDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997
  5. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API