Mangum v. Surles
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Justice.
Plaintiff’s assignments of error raise two questions for consideration: Did the trial judge err (1) in denying plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint to allege fraud in conformity with the evidence and (2) in refusing to submit the issue whether defendants had fraudulently obtained plaintiff’s signature to the deed in suit.
The threshold question is whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the record contained no evidence tending to show that defendants procured the execution of the deed by fraud. Obviously, if plaintiff produced no such evidence, the proposed…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Bradford Audio Corporation v. Edward Pious, Individually and as Purported Receiver of Bradford Audio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Calloway v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Furst v. . MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Decker v. KorthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Terry v. TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Mangum v. Raleigh Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- Estrada v. JaquesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.