Legal Opinion

Work v. State

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1990No. 18626PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTGOMERY, Justice.

We granted certiorari to consider this case in connection with the then pending case of Zurla v. State. We recently decided Zurla, 109 N.M. 640, 789 P.2d 588 (1990), holding that in the circumstances of that criminal case the defendant’s right to a speedy trial was violated. We now reach the same result in this case and take the opportunity it affords to explain one of the aspects of our decision in Zurla: the function of the presumption of prejudice arising from a finding that there has been a lengthy delay in bringing the defendant to trial.

I

Defendant John Work…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. Jose Avalos and Rudolfo CastrillonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Zurla v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. GarzaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Salandre v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. UrbanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. MaddoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. StockNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API