Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Avalos and Rudolfo Castrillon

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 4, 1976No. 20-90011PublishedCited by 167 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:

In this case we delve into the calculus by which the length and breadth of a criminal defendant’s right to speedy trial is measured. Our exploration traces the path of the appellants and their prosecutors through two jurisdictions — a journey that contributed to the government’s delay in bringing the defendants to trial. While the tickets for the journey and the post-arrival events bear a patina of spuriousness, this does not guarantee a constitutional sanctuary at journey’s end for the defendants.

We must engage in the calculus of delay, balancing the competing…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by167 opinions

  1. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. HeldtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  4. State v. LoveSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  5. United States v. A. Guy Crouch, III and Michael J. FryeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API