Legal Opinion

State v. Urban

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 2004No. 28047PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHAVEZ, Justice.

{1} On June 12, 2001, Defendant conditionally pleaded no contest to aggravated assault and shoplifting, reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his speedy-trial claim. The alleged crimes occurred on August 27, 1998. The State, however, did not indict Defendant until February 19,1999, and did not arraign him until fourteen months later, April 10, 2000. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court in a memorandum opinion, and we granted Defendant’s petition for certiorari. Although some of the delay is not considered in the analysis, we hold the State…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. State v. CoffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Zurla v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Salandre v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. GarzaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. DedmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. MaddoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. StockNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. SerrosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API