Legal Opinion

State v. Stock

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 2006No. 26,148PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

{1} This ease raises the difficult question of whether a defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial is violated when he is incarcerated and awaiting trial for more than three years, but the delay is in part attributable to the neglect of his overworked public defenders. We hold that, under the egregious facts of this particular case, the defendant’s speedy trial rights were violated. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of all the charges against the defendant.

BACKGROUND

{2} Defendant Paul Stock was indicted on numerous counts of criminal sexual…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  5. Harris v. ChampionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. BrillonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  2. State v. Vigil-GironNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. SerrosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API