Legal Opinion
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 7, 2011No. Case CV 09-3852 GAF (FFMx)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS BY FDIC AS RECEIVER AND FDIC IN ITS CORPORATE CAPACITY
GARY ALLEN FEESS, District Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
Deutsche Bank brings suit on behalf of itself and as trustee for numerous investors who hold mortgage-backed securities issued by IndyMac Bank, FSB. The suit asserts claims against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) in various capacities 1 as the successor to Indy-Mac, which failed in 2008. The FDIC in its capacity as receiver (“FDIC-R”) and in its corporate capacity (“FDIC-C”) now bring motions to dismiss claims arising out of its sale…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- MBIA Insurance Corp. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Bank of Manhattan, N.A. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Bank of Manhattan, N.A. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.