Bank of Manhattan, N.A. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Dissent by Judge RAWLINSON.
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its role *1134of receiver of a closed bank, may breach underlying asset contractual obligations without consequence.
I
A
In December 2007, Professional Business Bank (“PBB”) sold to First Heritage Bank, N.A. (“Heritage”) a fifty percent participation interest in a commercial loan PBB had made to Al’s Garden Art, Inc. The terms of the PBB-Heritage Participation Agreement (“Agreement”) imposed two contractual limitations on Heritage’s interest…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Miranda v. AnchondoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Whitney F. SHARPE; Mona E. Sharpe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FDIC, Receiver for Pioneer Bank, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- LNV Corporation v. Outsource Services ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Andrade v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020