Legal Opinion

Bank of Manhattan, N.A. v. Federal Deposit Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 4, 2015No. 12-56737PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Dissent by Judge RAWLINSON.

OPINION

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its role *1134of receiver of a closed bank, may breach underlying asset contractual obligations without consequence.

I

A

In December 2007, Professional Business Bank (“PBB”) sold to First Heritage Bank, N.A. (“Heritage”) a fifty percent participation interest in a commercial loan PBB had made to Al’s Garden Art, Inc. The terms of the PBB-Heritage Participation Agreement (“Agreement”) imposed two contractual limitations on Heritage’s interest…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Miranda v. AnchondoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Whitney F. SHARPE; Mona E. Sharpe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FDIC, Receiver for Pioneer Bank, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LNV Corporation v. Outsource Services ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. Andrade v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API