Legal Opinion

Oatman v. Niemeyer

California Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1929No. Docket No. Sac. 4110PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

On rehearing in bank, we adopt the statement of facts as set forth in the department opinion:

“This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial court• in favor of the plaintiff granting reformation of an instrument purporting to be a deed, by inserting therein a description of certain real property which was owned by the deceased, but which, it was claimed, was omitted by mistake from said instrument, and also quieting plaintiff’s title to the real property after said purported deed had been reformed. The appeal was taken on the judgment roll alone.
“ The facts found by the court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Merkle v. MerkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. House v. McMullenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hanlon v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Calhoun v. DownsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Cantlay v. Olds & Stoller Inter-ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Hotle v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Ryder v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API