Legal Opinion
Merkle v. Merkle
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 13, 1927No. Docket No. 3288PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to secure a decree reforming and correcting a certain deed, purporting to convey to her certain real property situated in the county of Nevada. Elizabeth Bierwagen, the owner and purported grantor of said property, was the mother of the plaintiff.
The amended complaint (verified) alleges that, on or about the eighth day of January, 1923, the said Elizabeth Bierwagen died in the county of Nevada, and that Carl P. Merkle and Christian Bierwagen “have been, and they are now, the duly appointed, qualified, and acting executors of the last will and testament of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- McCabe v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Stewart v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Hayden v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Stone v. DailyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- French v. BrinkmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Hayne v. CookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
- Cantlay v. Olds & Stoller Inter-ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Radin v. Jewish National FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Demetris v. DemetrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.