Legal Opinion

Portland Electric & Plumbing Co. v. City of Vancouver

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 12, 1981No. 4257-IIPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Langsdorf, J. *

Portland Electric and Plumbing Company (PEPCo), as an assignee of B & B Contracting Corporation (B & B), appeals from a summary judgment dismissing its suit against the City of Vancouver (City). The court determined that PEPCo's claim was barred by a contract term entered into by the City and B & B which prohibited B & B from assigning claims for monies due, absent the City's consent. The basic issue presented on appeal is whether. PEPCo's suit for "Breach of Contract and/or Unjust Enrichment" is a claim for monies due and covered by the antiassignment clause.

We begin with a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peterick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  2. Allhusen v. Caristo Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Levinson v. LindermanWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Pine Corp. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  5. Behrens v. CloudyWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Berschauer/Phillips Construction Co. v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Rumbin v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. In Re KaufmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Old National Bank v. ArnesonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. Styner v. EnglandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API