Portland Electric & Plumbing Co. v. City of Vancouver
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Langsdorf, J. *
Portland Electric and Plumbing Company (PEPCo), as an assignee of B & B Contracting Corporation (B & B), appeals from a summary judgment dismissing its suit against the City of Vancouver (City). The court determined that PEPCo's claim was barred by a contract term entered into by the City and B & B which prohibited B & B from assigning claims for monies due, absent the City's consent. The basic issue presented on appeal is whether. PEPCo's suit for "Breach of Contract and/or Unjust Enrichment" is a claim for monies due and covered by the antiassignment clause.
We begin with a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peterick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Allhusen v. Caristo Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Levinson v. LindermanWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Pine Corp. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Behrens v. CloudyWashington Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Berschauer/Phillips Construction Co. v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Rumbin v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- In Re KaufmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Old National Bank v. ArnesonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Styner v. EnglandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.