Legal Opinion
Styner v. England
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 13, 1985No. 6254-6-IIIPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McInturff, A.C.J.
Warren Styner and Kent McLachlan, d/b/a Stymac, a partnership, commenced this action against the marital community of G. James and Suzanne England to recover damages for Mr. England's failure to pay for shares of stock he ordered through a broker. The court granted Stymac summary judgment and awarded $23,968.75. This appeal challenges Stymac's standing to sue and whether a broker's violation of federal margin regulations precludes this claim. We affirm.
On December 1, 1981, Mr. England placed an order with Shearson, Loeb, Rhodes, Inc. (hereinafter Shearson) stockbroker Ward…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Helen C. Carras and Bill G. Carras, Co-Executors of the Estate of Gus N. Carras, Deceased v. James S. Burns, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Camer v. Seattle Post-IntelligencerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. v. M & L InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Allemeier v. University of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- SOUTH TACOMA WAY, LLC v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Stroud v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.