Legal Opinion

United States v. Dunhill

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 4, 1925No. 2605PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

Appellee imported on September 14, and again on October 22, 1923, a shipment of a fluid chemical mixture designated by the trade name of “Pypure.” These importations were both classified under paragraph 24 of the Tariff Act of 1922, at 80 cents per pound and 25 per centum ad valorem. They were claimed to be dutiable in each instance by the appellee as smokers’ articles, under paragraph 1454 of said act, with alternative claims as a chemical compound under paragraph 5, or as an unenumerated manufactured article under paragraph 1459, of said act. The board sustained the importer’s claim under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  3. Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Vandiver v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Roger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  2. Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. United States v. A. W. Faber, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  4. James Betesh Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  5. Atlantic Coast Fisheries Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API