Bluefries New York, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wilson, Judge:
This case has been submitted to the court for disposition upon a written stipulation, the following portions of which contain the facts pertinent to our decision herein:
1. The items of merchandise covered by the above-numbered protest which are marked “A” and initialed JJO on the invoice covered by said protest were appraised * * * on the basis of American selling price * * * and upon liquida*80tion were classified by the Collector of Customs as synthetic resin-like products under the provisions of paragraph 28 (a) * * * and duty was assessed at the compound rates of 3*4 cents per…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chew Hing Lung v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Arthur v. LaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- C. O. Mason, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Norton & Ellis, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Bluefries New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Bluefries New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.