Legal Opinion

Bluefries New York, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 22, 1957No. C. D. 1909PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

This case has been submitted to the court for disposition upon a written stipulation, the following portions of which contain the facts pertinent to our decision herein:

1. The items of merchandise covered by the above-numbered protest which are marked “A” and initialed JJO on the invoice covered by said protest were appraised * * * on the basis of American selling price * * * and upon liquida*80tion were classified by the Collector of Customs as synthetic resin-like products under the provisions of paragraph 28 (a) * * * and duty was assessed at the compound rates of 3*4 cents per…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chew Hing Lung v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Arthur v. LaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  5. Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. C. O. Mason, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Norton & Ellis, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. Bluefries New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Bluefries New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  5. R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API