Legal Opinion
Jacobs Technology Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 8, 2011No. Nos. 11-180C, 11-190CPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAMICH, Judge.
Before the Court in this consolidated bid protest ease is the Plaintiff Jacobs Technology Inc.’s (“Jacobs” ’) motion for judgment on the administrative record, and cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record by Defendant United States (the “Government”) and Defendant-Intervenor IBM Global Business Services (“IBM”).
For the reasons explained below, Jacobs’ motion for judgment on the administrative record is denied. The Government’s and IBM’s cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record are granted.
I. BACKGROUND
The Department of Defense United States…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Gentex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Turner Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- CBY Design Builders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Jacobs Technology Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Jacobs Technology Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.