Jacobs Technology Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DAMICH, Judge.
Before the Court in this consolidated bid protest case are (1) the motions of Plaintiff2 IBM Global Business Services (“IBM”) to compel discovery and to supplement the administrative record and motion for judgment on the administrative record and (2) cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record by the Defendant United States and Defendant-Intervenor Jacobs Technology Inc. (“Jacobs”).
In brief, IBM challenges the Department of Defense United States Special Operations Command’s (variously, “USSOCOM’s,” “agency’s,” or “Defendant’s”) initial contract award…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Jordan Pond Company, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Crassociates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Davis Boat Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- BINL, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Netstar-1 Government Consulting, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.