Legal Opinion
Jacobs Technology Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 31, 2017No. 16-1602C 17-88C (not consolidated)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bid-protests; challenges to corrective action; jurisdiction; standing; ripeness; mootness; validity of the agency’s decision to take corrective action; inadequacy of showing to support discovery into alleged bias
OPINION AND ORDER 1
LETTOW, Judge.
These bid protests address a procurement that has spanned years and has proved to be refractory and intricate. A solicitation by the United States (“the government”), acting by and through the United States Department of the Army (“Army” or “agency”), was initiated in 2013 for a mission-test, support-services contract at the United States Army Yuma…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Texas ex rel. Texas Workforce Commission v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Novak Birch, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Abacus Technology Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- Amazon Web Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Fms Investment Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.