Legal Opinion

Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1992No. 90-2414PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We have recognized a bifurcated standard of review in appeals from orders of the Public Utilities Commission:

“ ‘As to questions of fact, this court has repeatedly enunciated the rule that orders of the commission will not be reversed unless they are manifestly against the weight of the evidence or are so clearly unsupported by the record as to show misapprehension, mistake or willful disregard of duty. * * * [Citations omitted.]

“ ‘As to questions of law, however, this court has complete, independent power of review. Legal issues are accordingly subjected to more intensive examination than are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elyria Foundry Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In re Application of Suburban Natural Gas Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API