Legal Opinion

Dahl-Beck Electric Co. v. Rogge

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 1969No. Civ. 25219PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, P. J.

Plaintiff corporation appeals from a judgment entered after a jury verdict awarding $1,215 to defendant George Rogge, on his cross-complaint, and finding in favor of said defendant and defendant Jack Stradford on plaintiff’s complaint.

The Facts

In July 1964 plaintiff, an electrical contractor, was performing work on the premises of the University of San Francisco pursuant to contract. A representative of plaintiff telephoned Rogge and asked if Rogge had a backhoe available for trench digging. Rogge sent Stradford and the backhoe to the jobsite. The rate agreed to be paid to Rogge was $14 per…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Hoel v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Burlingham v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. People v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Harris v. Vector Marketing Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
  3. Diamond Springs Lime Co. v. American River ConstructorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Sumner Development Corporation v. ShiversAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Ranchwood Communities Limited Partnership v. Jim Beat Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API