Legal Opinion

Sumner Development Corporation v. Shivers

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1974No. 2036PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Justice.

We granted this petition for review in order to consider important questions respecting the application of Alaska’s contractor’s licensing statutes to civil litigation among subcontractors, contractors and owners. 1

In August of 1972, the respondent Shivers, doing business as S & S Construction, entered into a contract with petitioner Sumner Development Corporation for the performance by S & S of site work on Majestic View Subdivision. The subdivision was partially owned by Sumner which, as general contractor, was developing it. Neither at the time of entering into…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Martinez v. Research Park, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Latipac, Inc. v. Superior Court of Marin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Murphy v. Campbell Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Magill v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1958

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Wetzler v. WetzlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Bachner v. RichAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hootch Ex Rel. Hootch v. Alaska State-Operated School SystemAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. WeidnerAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Capo v. Century Life InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API