Legal Opinion

P. C. Products Corp. v. Williams

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 1976No. Civ. 75-743PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

NEALON, District Judge.

Defendant, American Electric Corporation, (American Electric) has filed a motion to dismiss for improper venue, or, in the alternative, to transfer the suit to a more convenient forum. With respect to the motion to dismiss, the parties agree that the dispositive issue is whether American Electric is “doing business” within this district within the meaning of the general venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c). This issue, in turn, actually consists of two issues: (1) what test is used to determine what is “doing business” within the meaning of Section 1391(c) — is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Housing Authority v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Houston Fearless Corporation v. Guy TeterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  3. Remington Rand, Inc. v. Knapp-Monarch CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Martin v. Fischbach Trucking Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
  5. Rensing v. Turner Aviation CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Maybelline Co. v. Noxell Corporation Ssc & B: Lintas WorldwideCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. South-Coast BankDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1984
  3. Rollins v. Proctor & SchwartzDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
  4. Lubrizol Corp. v. Neville Chemical Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1978
  5. Scott Paper Co. v. Nice-Pak Products, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API