Legal Opinion
Lubrizol Corp. v. Neville Chemical Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 27, 1978No. Civ. A. C78-32APublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CONTIE, District Judge.
The present action is before the Court upon defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). Upon consideration and for the reasons stated below, said motion shall be granted in part and this action shall be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
Plaintiff, The Lubrizol Corporation, is organized under the laws of the State of Ohio and has its principal place of business within Ohio.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- In-Flight Devices Corporation v. Van Dusen Air, Incorporated, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Honda Associates, Inc. v. Nozawa Trading, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson Creative Arts, Inc. v. Wool Masters, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1983
- Maybelline Co. v. Noxell Corporation Ssc & B: Lintas WorldwideCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. South-Coast BankDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1984
- Accutest Corp. v. Accu Test Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
- Conaway Enterprises, Inc. v. Dyna Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.