Legal Opinion
Remington Rand, Inc. v. Knapp-Monarch Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 14, 1956No. Civ. A. 19001PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WRIGHT, District Judge.
This is an action for declaratory judgment involving charges made by defendant that plaintiff is infringing its patent. 1 Plaintiff, Remington Rand, Inc., is a Delaware corporation with an office and place of business at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Defendant, Knapp-Monarch Company, is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at St. Louis, Missouri. The defendant, Knapp-Monarch Company, has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint or in lieu thereof to quash the return of summons. Two grounds advanced in support of the motion are improper venue and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Polizzi v. Cowles Magazines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Johnson Creative Arts, Inc. v. Wool Masters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Philadelphia Housing Authority v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. MoseleIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Gottlieb v. Sandia American Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.