Legal Opinion

Maybelline Co. v. Noxell Corporation Ssc & B: Lintas Worldwide

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1987No. 86-2087PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Maybelline Co. brought this action against Noxell Corporation and SSC & B: Lintas Worldwide seeking to enjoin alleged false representations in violation of section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) (1982), concerning Noxell’s product “Cover Girl Clean Lash Mascara.” Noxell markets Clean Lash as a waterproof mascara. Maybelline’s complaint alleged that Clean Lash was not a waterproof mascara and that the Clean Lash advertising campaign and product packaging, both of which promoted Clean Lash as a waterproof mascara, were false and deceptive. Noxell and SSC &…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Missouri Housing Development Commission v. Edward W. Brice, Jr., Paul Goodrich, Joseph TimiltyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,913 Asset Allocation and Management Company v. Western Employers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Richard "Bud" Steen v. Robert MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  4. Eason v. Linden Avionics, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  5. Dody v. BrownDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API