Legal Opinion
Friedman Bros. Holding Co. v. Nathan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 11, 1924No. 23,870PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action for rent on a written lease. A verdict was directed for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals from the order denying its motion for a new trial.
The defendant owns a leasehold cornering on Wabasha and Eighth streets in St. Paul used as a theater. In the rear to the east and fronting 34 feet northerly on Eighth street is a property of which the plaintiff has a long time ground lease. On April 13, *1021921, the plaintiff executed a lease of this property to the defendant at a monthly rental of $400 per month for the term of 10 years from April 1, 1921. Rent was paid -as it accrued until…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Suydam v. . JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Kafka v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Meserole v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Harris v. CorliesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Weiss v. Zenith Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- Belmont Clothes, Inc. v. PleetCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Geo. Benz & Sons v. HassieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- State v. IrishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Siggelkow v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Friedman Bros. Holding Co. v. NathanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925