Friedman Bros. Holding Co. v. Nathan

Action for rent wherein defendant appeals from an- order denying his motion for a new trial after a directed verdict for plaintiff. There have been two trials. Upon the first a verdict was directed for defendant and plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was denied. Upon appeal, there was a reversal, the decision being reported in 159 Minn. 101, 198 N. W. 160, 37 A. L. R. 1166. The story of the case, exclusive of the second trial and its result, is told there at sufficient length. We then held that the exclusion of certain evidence offered by plaintiff was error. That evidence is set forth at…