Legal Opinion

Geo. Benz & Sons v. Hassie

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 28, 1940No. 32,289PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This action was brought to recover the balance due on a contract for the sale of furniture and furnishings in the Glendale Apartments in St. Paul. Plaintiff prevailed below. Defendant appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The contract on which the action was based was executed on November 30, 1936. By its terms plaintiff sold to defendant the furniture and furnishings under conditional sales contract for the contract price of $3,398.53 payable in monthly installments of $75. Plaintiff reserved in itself title, right of possession, and the right to declare…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Brooks v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  3. Loughran v. LoughranSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Planters' Bank v. Union BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Kirshenbaum v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Everyday Learning Corporation, - Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Cheryl Larson, - Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  2. Loth v. LothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Douglas A. Kelley v. Gus BoosalisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  4. Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRACourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Lamberton v. LambertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API