Legal Opinion

Belmont Clothes, Inc. v. Pleet

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 16, 1962No. [No. 20, September Term, 1962.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSybeet, J.

In September, 1961, the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City instituted a condemnation proceeding in the Superior Court of Baltimore City to acquire the fee simple interest in the property known as 33-35 Hopkins Place for public redevelopment purposes. Joined as defendants were Fannie E. Pleet, who owned the property in fee simple, and Emanuel Pleet, her husband (appellees here), and Belmont Clothes, Inc., tenant of the property (appellant here), as well as certain other parties not affected by this appeal.

The Pleets, in their answer to the City’s condemnation petition, denied that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Gluck v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  3. In Re Improvement of Third Steeet, St. Paul. Buckbee-Mears Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. In Re John C. Lodge HighwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Veirs v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wells v. Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Fowler v. A & A Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. DirecTV, Inc. v. MattinglyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Maxey v. Redevelopment Authority of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Musser v. Bank of AmericaNevada Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API