Legal Opinion
Siggelkow v. Arnold
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 2, 1932No. 29,197PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Plaintiff appeals from the order sustaining a demurrer to his petition, made pursuant to 2 Mason, 1927, §§ 6578-1, 6578-2 (L. 1921, p. 270, c. 219).
The main facts of the petition are: Elise Asmussen, until her death on November 23, 1931, was the owner of lot 15, block 2, Mackubin & Marshall’s addition to St. Paul. She died testate. The defendant Arnold is her executor, and the other defendants are her sole heirs and legatees. On August 1, 1928, Elise Asmussen leased, by written lease, to petitioner for a term of five years the downstairs portion of the brick building on said lot for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kafka v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- In Re Improvement of Third Steeet, St. Paul. Buckbee-Mears Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Grant County State Bank Ex Rel. Veigel v. SchultzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Friedman Bros. Holding Co. v. NathanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
3Cited by4 opinions
- Belmont Clothes, Inc. v. PleetCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Columbus v. Huntington National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
- State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. VitaleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- St. Louis Park Post No. 5632 v. City of St. Louis ParkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004